.
Feedback

Federal Program Offers Free Day Care Meals

Children and adults enrolled in day care facilities may be eligible for free meals through the Child and Adult Care Food Program coordinated by the New Jersey Department of Agriculture.

For Immediate Release: September 12, 2012
Contact: Lynne Richmond  (609) 633-2954

(TRENTON) -- All day care facilities and their participants should be aware that children and adults enrolled in day care facilities may be eligible for free meals through the Child and Adult Care Food Program coordinated by the New Jersey Department of Agriculture.

The Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) is a federally-funded program that reimburses sponsoring agencies that provide healthy meals and snacks at no charge to children and adults enrolled in licensed or approved day care facilities or family day care homes.

Meals are available at no separate charge to all enrolled participants in the Child and Adult Care Food Program and are served without regard to race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability. 

Following are the Income Eligibility Guidelines used in determining eligibility for free and reduced price meals for the period from July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2013:

ELIGIBILITY INCOME SCALE

Effective from July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2013

Family Size

Free Yearly Income

Reduced Yearly Income

1

$14,521

$20,665

2

$19,669

$27,991

3

$24,817

$35,317

4

$29,965

$42,643

Each Additional

Family Member

 

+$ 5,148

 

+$7,326

The Child and Adult Care Food Program is funded by the Food and Nutrition Service, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and is operated in accordance with USDA policy, which does not permit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability in the meal service, admissions policy or use of any Adult Food Program facility.

To file a complaint of discrimination, write to the USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call, toll free, (866) 632-9992 (Voice),  (800) 877-8339 (TDD) or (866) 377-8642 (Relay Voice Users). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

To learn more about the CACFP and the participating centers in a particular area, contact the New Jersey Department of Agriculture at (609) 984-1250.  For more information about any of USDA’s nutrition assistance programs, write to the USDA, Food and Nutrition Service, Child Nutrition Division, 3101 Park Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302, or visit the web site at http://www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/Care/.

Find us on Facebook to learn more about the New Jersey Department of Agriculture www.facebook.com/NJDeptofAgriculture.

jerseyswamps September 15, 2012 at 01:37 am
I'll start. As I said in another article. Obama gutted what was a good reform of our welfare system for families. This was signed into law by Clinton. That's right, Democrat Bill Clinton. It required those on welfare to do something. That is go to school, training, look for work, etc. Reform also did not grant an automatic increase in a welfare grant for more children. The child did receive medicaid and food stamps but not extra money. Welfare rolls dropped. Obama gutted the work requirement. He also did away with the resource limit for food stamps. We now have people in very expensive homes with several expensive cars, jewelry, etc. receiving food stamps if they can show no income. Obama is very happy to have more people receiving entitlements from him. Those people are less likely to vote against him.
Paul J. DiBartolo September 15, 2012 at 01:47 am
And whose accountant are you, Billy? I recommend Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams,or maybe Gary North. When you figure out what economics is all about then I might want to hear about it.
Look, I'm a little slow on the uptake so maybe you can help me... "Anyone that took economics knows that a nation collects the same amount of dollars at 100% tax rate as it would at 0% tax rate..." I guess I'm not "Anyone" so maybe you can enlighten me. While you're at it maybe you can point to an example of how that theory worked out, as well. BTW, we've spent trillions on welfare since Lyndon Johnson instituted his Great Society, could you please elaborate on the huge returns that has produced? As for austerity only applicable in times of plenty, tell it to the Greeks and the Spanish, you'll probably find a better audience there if you can get them to stop rioting long enough to listen to you. BTW, you almost had me thinking you were serious until you implied that printing money was a good thing and an obligation in times like these. Do you even read what you write, Billy?
Paul J. DiBartolo September 15, 2012 at 01:50 am
The Department of Education, revamp the tax code and trim down the IRS, get real about the EPA and stop making it impossible to do business in the U.S.
Just a simple start.
Paul J. DiBartolo September 15, 2012 at 01:57 am
I'm trying to follow along and then this...
"a single parent has to make under 19k to get free meals. that is just over a grand in take home pay." Is that misstated; if not, what does that mean?
Patrick September 15, 2012 at 02:32 am
I should have said a month... Take out all the payroll taxes a person earning at the bottom of this list takes home a grand a month.
Jack Spratt September 15, 2012 at 02:33 am
You breed em
You feed em Take a look at the cars the parents of the free meals are driving. Better yet, drive over to the subsidized housing next to Whole Foods and see the Hummer, the Lexus SUV, the new Mustang and other luxury cars driven by the parents of subsidized housing, utilities, EBT, cell phones, day care .......
chris September 15, 2012 at 02:36 am
Ummmm earth to Spooner......if anyone here is a race baiter its you !
SmallTownAntics September 15, 2012 at 02:37 am
Oh, and Obama will also be busy first attending the $40,000/plate fundraiser hosted by Jay-z and Beyonce...before heading over to the David Letterman show. Democrats have been hoodwinked. Jay Z and Beyonce have a net worth of almost $1 BILLION, but Dems say Romney is the 'rich whitey.' Appalling hypocrisy.
Donna Griffin September 15, 2012 at 02:49 am
Patrick - I listen to an awful lot of news and I'm unaware of ANYONE trying to take away contraception. Enlighten me, please. I reckon that there is a difference between available contraceptives and FREE contraceptives. Is that what you are talking about? You see, I've always been hammered with the freedom cry that a woman had the right to do with her body as she pleases. I think they call it Pro-Choice. As such, I might recommend that ladies choose to save a couple bucks, buy some pills or condoms, then enjoy their Saturday night. JUST DON'T ASK ME TO PAY FOR IT!
SmallTownAntics September 15, 2012 at 02:52 am
Spooner, i've lived in the US for 6 decades and I've never known of ANYONE...family friends or anyone who have gone to Europe for their medical treatment. Show me 'the facts' on that. Heck, most people couldn't afford the $1000 plane ticket to get there or the $500/night hotels once they're there. Are you talking about some LaLaLand celebrities who go their for lypo or what?
Billy Pilgrim September 15, 2012 at 03:28 am
Hey Paul, as far as the 100% and 0% tax rate being the same. A country gets 0%. When the tax rate is 0% there is no revenue. When the tax rate is 100%, there is no revenue generated either because, what's the use of working? It needs to be somewhere near the bottom third in order to make it worth people's time, but that the government gets the money that it needs. As far as an example? look at the last several decades of tax history. Also, it is based largely on Laffer Curves if you are truly interested.
With regards to austerity, if you had a farm and grew tons and tons of corn, you'd be a fool to eat it all just because you had a decent harvest. Most people would stow the majority of it away, and consume it during the lean months. I do think you mistake my compassion for being naive. I think we are wasting money on straight handouts, and must somehow tie some if not most to work. But denying Americans access to basic necessities is not what I believe in. I think we too often confuse needs and wants. Food, shelter, clothes, and basic healthcare should somehow be made available to everyone.
Butterfly September 15, 2012 at 04:43 am
@Donna: "I've lived in Germany for a few years and trust me their state-run healthcare system is the dregs "
Not true at all. The system is not state run nor is it the dregs. The US 'system' is the 'dregs' aka ranked 48th in the industrialized world. And do not let me get started on the paper work nightmare here ...
Butterfly September 15, 2012 at 04:47 am
@Sal, get a grip; why this shouting with ALLCAPS? And Obama's policies are pretty much center right not socialist. Are you watching Fox News, listen to Rush and reading Drudge?
Butterfly September 15, 2012 at 04:49 am
@Donna: "No free medical care. No free meals...Just pure, unadulterated hard work...the American dream "
really? Sounds like you want your children to be like Oliver Twist ..
Donna Griffin September 15, 2012 at 10:57 am
Butterfly, try living with the locals. Their tax rate is progressively at nearly 45% plus add in the cost of fuel at $8.35/gallon and you have a very burdened populace. According to recent reviews, lots of care is given in Germany for which we don’t actually know the effectiveness compared to other treatments. There is overutilization of the system. Also, the German system is a bit rigid in its structure, which makes innovation in organizing health care more difficult than it is here.
Donna Griffin September 15, 2012 at 11:03 am
Butterfly - Actually, I want my kids to go through life "earning" their successes not having them handed to them. Thankfully, the lessons have been learned in my home, but I fear that many share your entitlement view and my kids will be the minority in the arena of personal responsibility. The best gifts a parent can give their children are the tools to fend for themselves. I really hope you're not suggesting that those values are "old school" and not beneficial to young adults.
Paul J. DiBartolo September 15, 2012 at 01:12 pm
Wow, Billy, that's enlightening and we're really not that far apart. Imagine that a short explanation would achieve that? Anyway, back to some of our points; your 0% versus 100% scenario can only be pure analysis (I don't doubt it's true) because it's never been put into practice. Although, I must point out that Barack Obama identified a quote from his father stating that 100% taxation was justified if needed. Now I'm wondering if President Obama didn't also inherit some of his father's insanity as well as the dreams he attributes to him. I'm all for cutting our corporate charity and foreign aid charity, as well. I do have a problem with your assignment of saving (and that's all it is, old-fashioned saving as recommended in the Bible) to austerity. In fact your good time/bad time scenario is right out of the Bible, right? Joseph as Pharaoh's economic minister? The difference is that Joseph had inside information of a coming plague. Saving some of what you make is just common sense whether you use it for bad times or look to provide for your old age when you can't work as hard or to pass on an inheritance to your children. Austerity comes when you hit the bad times and start using what you have saved. You don't live off of savings in hard times at the same level you lived in good times; if you do you're crazy. So, I think you're a little off in confusing saving with austerity. As for printing money...that is never a good idea and we can discuss that further if you like.
Pinkie Schumacher September 17, 2012 at 11:33 am
Um, no. You do realize that the US started school nutrition programs during WWII? At the urging of military leaders because so many young men were too malnourished to serve in the military. So, no, it's not the current administration trying to brainwash our first-graders with milk and chicken patties.
Pinkie Schumacher September 17, 2012 at 11:56 am
"You breed em, you feed em?" How clever, did you come up with that yourself or is that a really tired cliche? Well I guess the myth of the welfare queen is alive and well, because your friend of a friend of a friend once saw someone with a cell phone in subsidized housing.
It might also be helpful to read the article. The food programs are also for ADULTS in day programs. Perhaps you should go down to your local senior center and tell a 90 year old veteran that their "parents bred em, so they should a fed em."
John Jay September 17, 2012 at 11:59 am
Get the Socialists (disguised as Democrats) out of the my wallet. If they want to experiment with economics, let them play with the Simms instead of with the family's future.
--but HEY, where would the Socialists (disguised as Democrats) be without legalized plunder?
John Jay September 17, 2012 at 12:16 pm
Which Whole Foods, Jack Spratt? There's a 100% low-income housing in Manalapan and I saw the same thing. The kids at the bus stops are in new clothes too sure don't look hungry.
Again, I ask: Where is the justice and fairness in not taxing the owners of these rental properties for the cost of educating the tennants' children in the public school system? The builders of these units don't put them up out of love, they do it for buck -- and they do it on the backs of property tax payers. Using the logic of the Socialists bankrupting this state, we should be "entitled" to a Lotus Esprit Sports car. At $115,000 that's a bargain since it costs about $230K to raise a child until age 18. Oh wait, I forgot! I actually have a thing called "moral compass"!! I know that it's WRONG to make babies I can't feed...it's the same reason why I don't use the meager college fund my spouse and I building to put out kids through school for a Lotus Esprit. What the heck is wrong with these people??? RE: "Jack Spratt 10:33 pm on Friday, September 14, 2012 Take a look at the cars the parents of the free meals are driving. Better yet, drive over to the subsidized housing next to Whole Foods and see the Hummer, the Lexus SUV, the new Mustang and other luxury cars driven by the parents of subsidized housing, utilities, EBT, cell phones, day care ......."
mgh1115 September 17, 2012 at 12:20 pm
Seriously, Hussein? The fact you have to stress the Hussein part everytime shows your ignorance and prejudice. You do realize that people like you who do that, hurt your own arguments because we might as well put an asterisk next to your comments that says, "Look, no matter what Obama does, I hate him."
His middle name is Hussein, get the f*ck over it. I suppose we shouldn't name kids Jeff or Jefferson since the President of the Confederacy i.e. essentially treason against the US was named Jefferson.
TheGreatHoax September 17, 2012 at 12:30 pm
@clamdigger -exactly. all that healthy food that WE pay for is going straight into the garbage. If you can't afford kids don't have them. There are ways to prevent pregnancy ya know. Or just plain don't do the deed (self control). Why is it the taxpayers responsibility to pay for the lack of self control of others?
TheGreatHoax September 17, 2012 at 12:31 pm
@ Tee. Don't worry under Obamacare we'll all be on "medicaid". Good luck finding a doctor once it's fully in effect.
Dominick September 17, 2012 at 12:48 pm
Most of these "hungry" kids are obese anyway. Let them eat less and we will save on feeding them and treating them for a myriad of obesity related illnesses later in life. The free meals should be given out based on height and weight not income.
marylou September 17, 2012 at 12:52 pm
I do know a few families who live in Germany and they have nothing bad to say about the care they receive.If someone has high blood pressure,the medical professionals don't just prescribe drugs to control it.They advise patients to lower their sodium intake and get exercise 1st.In other words,they don't look to pills to treat conditions that can be controled woth lifestyle changes.Very nuch like things used to be done in the USA.Every drug has side affects.Some people in this country take drugs to treat the side affects from other drugs they are taking.
Patients are not given MRIs to rule out brain tumors if they have a headache,either.
marylou September 17, 2012 at 01:01 pm
Donna.My ancestors have been in the US sonce long before Ellis Is.My husband's grandparents came from eastern Europe as teenagers during that time.True,no signs in their nagtive language.True,they worked hard,But they did get so-called handouts.They charged at the local food stores and other place where they needed necessities.If they were sick,they went to the doctor,whether or not they could pay up front.But,the difference is that these providers of goods and services knew that they would be paid.The doctor might have been paid partially with services provided by the family,babysitting,housework,yardwork,vegetables from the garden,etc.
marylou September 17, 2012 at 01:20 pm
The nearest subsidized housing that I know of is for senior citizens.Most of them have no cars at all.They are provided a bus to do their weekly grocery shopping at Shop-Rite,not Whole Foods
Peter Koenig September 17, 2012 at 02:38 pm
I don't mean to sound patronizing. I have a background in comparative economic systems, with a concentration in the economics of development. Reading Friedrich Hayek (whom free-marketeers like me enjoy) and especially Bela Balassa (a free-marketeer with direct experience in the failure of Communism in a post-industrial society - and my favorite college professor), one sees that Communism is a pre-industrial phenomenon. Among its many failings is the inability to grasp that, in a highly-developed economy, directly productive capital (think factories) becomes secondary to skilled labor; a middle class evolves; service occupations supplant traditional factory jobs. This is the opposite of the Marxist concept of alienation: instead of the "proletariat" becoming increasingly numerous and poorer, the "proletariat" basically disappears. This is not yet happening in China, but it probably will - and when it does, the better-educated and more prosperous "masses" will demand greater freedom. I do not believe that the "mega corps and banks" are behind the service-economy evolution. They would prefer that the US depended upon big factories and capital investment, which they would own and finance. From the Marxian percpective - again, absolutely not my perspective - the greedy capitalists are the cause of alienation. So: Communism is pre-industrial; it fails after industrialization; the US's move toward a service economy is a good thing.
Phil September 17, 2012 at 02:50 pm
@jerseyswamps, you do realize that governors, including Mitt Romney, Bobby Jindhal and Rick Scott asked the Obama administration to lessen the reforms for welfare system, right?

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Clark-Garwood Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jenn Cohen Bixon March 10, 2013 at 11:44 pm
As a former Clark resident I'm thrilled the Clark community is supporting such a great cause!!